The fashion towards thinner and more compact laptops is terrific, but a transportable laptop must also be lightweight. Enter the 15.6-inch Acer Swift five and 14-inch LG Gram 14 2-in-1 of the first-rate Ultrabooks around. But don’t be fooled by their feathery chassis’; the Swift five and Gram 14 2-in-1 % have a ton of performance to go together with their vibrant shows, long battery life, and a strong selection of ports.
You can not go wrong with both computers; however, who wins this featherweight fight? Read on to discover.
Acer Swift five vs. LG Gram 14 2-in-1: Specs Compared
Design
These laptops are one-trick ponies about design; however, what an impressive trick it’s. Your jaw will drop to the floor while you carry these impossibly lightweight machines.
I turned conv, and Acer had sent me an empty shell the first time I picked up the two.2-pound Swift five. You actually can’t blame me, either, while you consider that the 15.6-inch Swift 5 weighs much less than the 12.3-inch Surface Pro 6 tablet (with the keyboard attachment). The Gram 14 2-in-1 is inside the same weight elegance but at 2. Four kilos, this 14-inch convertible sits on the ground of this featherweight seesaw.
How did Acer and LG achieve this outstanding feat? It all comes down to the substances. The Swift five is made from a magnesium-lithium and magnesium-aluminum combo, and the Gram 14 2-in-1 is further crafted from magnesium alloy.
There is little else worth noting about those pc’s designs besides their lightness. With its MacBook-like silver and black design, the Swift’s chassis, in all fairness, is bland and could be unsuitable for a financial machine without difficulty. The equally unassuming Gram 14 2-in-1 comes in a more interesting slate-grey end, and the keyboard sits on a level deck, giving the Gram a few modern-day aptitudes. The Gram also enormously exceeded seven MIL-SPEC-810G trying out; this means it could face up to drops, shocks, and excessive temperatures.
Another massive distinction among those laptops is that the Gram 14 2-in-1 can fold back into a pill or be placed in tent mode, while the Swift five’s hinge only rotates flat. Of course, the 14-inch Gram (12. Eight x 8.3 x 0.7 inches) additionally has a smaller chassis than the 15.6-inch Swift five (14.1 x nine.1 x zero.6 inches), even though the Acer is a hair thinner.
Winner: LG Gram 14 2-in-1
Ports
The Swift Five and Gram 14 2-in-1 have nearly the same choice of ports. However, a microSD card reader arms this spherical to LG’s convertible computer.
On the left side of the Swift 5 are two USB three. Zero ports, an HDMI input, and the computer’s unmarried USB-C port. On the alternative aspect of the chassis is a headphone/mic combo jack and a Noble lock slot.
The Gram 14 2-in-1 has equal ports and a microSD card slot on the right. Additionally, USB three.1 Type-A port on every side of the laptop offers faster switch speeds than the Swift 5’s USB three. Zero ports.
Winner: LG Gram 14 2-in-1
Display
Crisp, vivid, and bordered via razor-thin bezels, the 1080p contact screens on each laptop are gorgeous. When I compared the side-through aspect, the two monitors seemed practically equal. After watching a trailer for the imminent film Hellboy, I observed a slightly warmer white balance on the Swift 5; however, each monitor appeared similarly color-accurate.
The Gram 14 2-in-1 has a smaller, 14-inch screen, giving it a better pixel density on paper. However, the Gram did not appear any sharper than the Swift Five to my eyes, and I desired to view content material on the huge, 15.6-inch panel anyway. The Swift 5’s screen also looked a chunk brighter than the Gram 14 2-in-1’s, but I’m splitting hairs right here.
Both smooth displays are reflective, doubling as mirrors during darker scenes. The Gram 14 2-in-1’s touch screen is more useful than the Swift 5’s. It is no longer most effective because the Gram can turn into tablet mode, but also because the Swift Five’s display has an unusual movie over it that feels sticky to touch.
Proving how similar they may be, the presentations on the Swift five and Gram 14 2-in-1 can reproduce 129 percent and 128 percent of the sRGB color gamut, respectively. Those scores also show how extra vibrant those shows are compared to the average premium computer (118 percent).
The best concrete victory within the show class goes to the Swift 5, which peaked at 283 nits, making it brighter than the Gram 14 2-in-1 (253 nits). Unfortunately, neither screen became as luminous as the common top-rate computer (327 nits).
Winner: Acer Swift 5
Keyboard and Touchpad
This is any other toss-up class. However, I’ll slightly nod to the Swift Five’s keyboard for its barely larger and extra responsive keys.
Both keyboards are shallow, especially for the dimensions of those laptops. The Swift 5’s keys are 1.1 millimeters off the journey, whereas the Gram 14 2-in-1’s keys depress 1.2 mm (both measurements are beneath our 1. Five mm preference).
The Swift five’s keys have an actuation force of sixty-eight grams simultaneously as the Gram 14 2-in-1’s want 67 grams of pressure to actuation. Those measurements supply both keyboards a satisfying tactile bump, though the Gram 14 2-in-1’s keys experience a piece stiffer. The Backspace and Enter keys at the Gram are also annoyingly small.
Using the Gram 14 2-in-1’s keyboard, I typed at 115 phrases consistent with minute with a correct charge of ninety-five percent on the 10FastFingers typing test, which is only a tad slower than the 121 wpm I executed on the Swift 5.
Armed with Windows Precision drivers, the responsive four.1 x 2. Five-inch touchpads on the Swift 5 and Gram 14 2-in-1 replied quickly to my Windows 10 gestures, like pinch-to-zoom and three-finger swipe to interchange apps.
Winner: Acer Swift five
Performance
Packing the cutting-edge eighth-gen Intel Core CPUs, the Swift 5 and Gram 14 2-in-1 provide plenty of energy for everything from primary tasks like surfing social media to extra annoying applications like image and video enhancement.
The Gram 14 2-in-1 crowned the Swift five on our overall performance benchmarks. Keep in mind, however, that this isn’t a like-for-like contrast; our much less costly Swift five review unit came equipped with an Intel Core i5 CPU and 8GB of RAM, while the Gram 14 2-in-1 packed a Core i7 CPU and 16GB of RAM.
The Gram 14 2-in-1 scored a fifteen,943 on the Geekbench four. One typical performance test, topping the Swift 5’s 14,066 with a good margin. Both laptops exceeded the top class pc average of 13,323
It took the Gram 14 2-in-1’s 512GB M.2 SATA SSD 17 seconds to transport 4.97GB of blended-media files from one folder to another, equating to a transfer rate of 391 megabytes in keeping with 2nd. The Swift 5’s 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD completed the same mission at a fee of 299 MBps. Neither machine became as brief because of the average premium pc (542. Four MBps).
The Swift five fell, in addition, at the back of the Gram 14 2-in-1 on our video transcoding. Could you take a look at it? The Acer pc took a leisurely 26 and 24 mins to convert a 4K video into 1080p using the Handbrake app. That is longer than the Gram 14 2-in-1 (21:17) wished and lags behind the top-rate computer average (21 forty-five).
The Gram 14 2-in-1 matched sixty-five 000 names with their corresponding addresses in 1 minute and 25 seconds on our Excel Macro test. Unlike the Gram 14 2-in-1, the Swift five, with a time of one minute and 38 seconds, couldn’t pinnacle the category average of 1:32.
Relying on an Intel UHD 620 GPU, neither of those laptops is built for gaming. Nonetheless, they executed admirably on our 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited benchmark, with the Swift 5 netting an eighty-one 919 and the Gram 14 2-in-1 scoring 87,220. The outcomes have been flipped on our real-global gaming test, wherein the Swift 5 played the racing recreation Dirt 3 at fifty-six frames in step with second even as the Gram 14 2-in-1 maintained fifty-one fps.
Winner: LG Gram 14 2-in-1
Battery Life
The Gram 14 2-in-1 is the clear winner regarding battery life, having endured numerous hours longer than the Swift five on our Laptop Mag battery check, which entails non-stop net surfing over Wi-Fi at a hundred and fifty nits.
The Gram 14 2-in-1 lasted for a high-quality eleven hours and 28 hours, while the Swift 5 powered down after eight hours and 37 minutes. Although it fell well quickly of the Gram 14 2-in-1, the Swift 5 put up a respectable runtime or even topped the premium computer common of eight hours and 29 minutes.
Winner: LG Gram 14 2-in-1
Value and Price
You have constrained shopping for options with those laptops: there are two models of the Swift five, and the Gram 14 2-in-1 is available in a single configuration.
The base Swift five we reviewed costs $999 and is derived with an Intel Core i5-8265U CPU, 8GB of RAM, and a 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD. For
$1,399, you could improve to a Core i7-8565U CPU, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD.
The $1,499 Gram 2-in-1 has an Intel Core i7-8565U CPU, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD.
Winner: Acer Swift five
Overall Winner: Gram 14 2-in-1
This was a near contest, but we advise the Gram 14 2-in-1 over the Swift 5 for a few reasons. Namely, the Gram lasts numerous hours longer on a price, and its flexible chassis helps you to use the 1080p touch screen in pill mode. And unlike the Swift 5, the Gram 14 2-in-1 has a microSD card slot.
While we opt for the Gram 14 2-in-1, the Swift 5 remains an excellent option for folks who decide upon a bigger 15-inch display or want to shop some money on a Core i5 configuration.
