You’ve likely seen that most gaming laptops feature the Core i7 8750H or 8850H and outright ignore the more effective Core i9 8950HK. The Core i9 8950HK is the most effective laptop processor available right now, so why the discrepancy? Should you prefer to move on to the search for a Core i9 PC so that you have first-class gaming performance from the CPU angle?
Intel Core i9 vs. Core i7 Laptop Performance
The Core i9 vs. Core i7 for laptop struggle isn’t as simple as it would seem, and we’re here to show you why.
Specs Overview
The Intel Core i9 8950HK is the simplest overclockable laptop processor on the market. The Core i7 8850H and 8750H are mildly overclockable through four hundred MHz. However, that doesn’t rely on a good deal, and regularly, the laptop thermal answer with those Core i7 processors isn’t designed for overclocking.
On paper, the specifications make the Core i9 8950HK seem like a runaway winner from scratch. Higher clock speeds frequently result directly in improved body quotes, and the Core i9 8950HK has advanced Turbo Boost as well to push the speeds all the way up to four. Eight GHz.
Core i9 Turbo Boost and Overclock
However, the real tale is pretty special. The problem with the Turbo Boost of the Core i9 8950HK (and the overclocking headroom) is that it’s far heavily dependent on the laptop design. This way, across the admittedly small number of laptops that use the Core i9 8950HK, most effectively, a small percentage of notebooks can extract the whole energy of this processor.
As a result, the consistency and reliability of the Core i9 8950HK are not uniform across all products. The laptops that best use the Core i9’s high Turbo Boost frequencies and overclock headroom are the Gigabyte AORUS X9 and the MSI GT75. Some slimmer laptops like the Dell XPS 15 9570 and the ASUS Chimera G703 don’t reach equal heights but provide more consistent overall performance.
The cause for this massive inconsistency is Intel’s Thermal Velocity Boost. Thermal Velocity Boost pushes the faster pace via an extra 200 MHz. There’s a caveat, though: it works best if there is “enough turbo power price range available” and if the temperatures are low enough. The low sufficient temperature here is usually around 50 Celsius, and that’s where the issues are.
Most laptops providing the Core i9 8950H surely don’t have the thermal layout to hold temperatures so low to get the highest Turbo Boost speeds continually. For this purpose, for most people of the laptops obtainable, the Core i9 8950H certainly by no means hits the said Turbo Boost frequency of 4. Eight GHz and instead peaks at four.6 GHz. Four.6 GHz continues to be drastically advanced to what the Core i7 8850H and 8750H offer, but all over again, the better temperatures of the Core i9 8950H come into play, often preventing it from achieving even the four.6 GHz mark if the PC’s cooling system doesn’t assist it.
Core i9 8950HK vs. Core i7 8850H Benchmarks
Now, let’s get straight to the actual stuff. We’ve skipped artificial gaming benchmarks here because they don’t translate well to international performance in real video games. LaptopMag performed benchmark checks, pitting the Core i9 8950HK against the Core i7 8850H in three video games: Rise of the Tomb Raider, Hitman, and GTA V. The overclocked Core i9 8950HK is strolling at four.3 GHz, the maximum strong overclock at the MSI GT75 Titan 8RG without jogging into thermal throttling.
There is absolutely a difference in body rates on 1080p. However, the gain is marginal. Interestingly, the overclocked Core i9 8950H plays nearly identically to one running at base clock speeds. In the case of Rising of the Tomb, Raider honestly loses body fees, in all likelihood due to a few kinds of throttling (we’re no longer precisely certain why).
Which One to Choose?
Still, for those wanting some future-proofing for their laptop and willing to get a pleasant quality, even the small gain in fps must be sufficient to warrant shopping for the Core i9 8950HK over the Core i7 8850H, right?
Well, now, not quite. sFor the MSI GT75 Titan 8RG laptop, the charge distinction between the Core i9 8950HK version and the Core i7 8850H one is an awesome $500. The difference is so small that it no longer warrants considering the price delta between the two. Companies like Alienware call for an even steeper fee delta.
The quantity you’ll have to spend for such a marginal benefit is, without a doubt now, not well worth it. Furthermore, your preference may be extraordinarily restrained; at best, a handful of laptops with the Core i9 can surely extract first-rate performance from it. The Core i7 8850H and 8750H (especially the latter) don’t suffer from this trouble, as they may be much more widely used in gaming laptops than the Core i9.
Conclusion
For the marginal benefit in overall performance and the small set of Core i9 computer options available, there’s no motive to choose the Core i9 8950HK over the Core i7 8850H or 8750H. It is important to consider that the Core i9 8950HK isn’t even a true Core i9 since it doesn’t provide any additional threads for multi-core processing duties.
Higher base clock speeds sincerely suggest the pc Core i9 can outperform the two Core i7 models in video games, but the price you’ll pay for that makes it an unreasonable purchase. Furthermore, the Core i9 fails to hit its peak Turbo Boost speeds constantly on maximum computer fashions, in a few instances performing worse than the Core i7 fashions due to throttling.
