A number of presidency entities are a notion to still be investigating Facebook’s facts rules, that could quantity to hefty fines.

Facebook’s commercial enterprise has endured growing over the past year because it becomes repeatedly confronted with privacy scandals.

But as authorities agencies retain to probe the business, it could nevertheless be hit tough by way of a developing quantity of potential fines.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg subsidized stronger government law of the Internet on Saturday, but it can be too little too late for an

agency that stays mired in controversy and situation to investigations and feasible fines around the arena.

It’s been over 12 months for the reason that the public discovered that a U.K.-based totally political consulting company known as Cambridge Analytica exploited Facebook’s business version to influence the U.S. Presidential election in 2016. Since then, the business enterprise has faced developing scrutiny from its users and even employees as more privacy scandals unraveled at some stage in 2018.

Though Facebook’s top executives have been hauled in to face important congressional leaders, its customers and traders don’t appear to care. The organization, which has a market cost over $475 billion, published a strong Q4 2018 profits file in January. Facebook also met analysts’ expectations for day by day and monthly active users, which clocked in at 1.Fifty two billion and 2.32 billion, respectively. Despite all the scandals, its inventory price is up more than four percent over the last 12 months, trading at $166.Sixty-nine as of Friday’s close.

If customers do not care, regulators would possibly. Facebook nonetheless faces a number of investigations and expenses from numerous corporations within the U.S. And overseas, which mixed, have the ability to levy sizeable fines.

There are numerous agencies notion to be nevertheless investigating or charging Facebook over its information practices, although numerous companies declined to verify the fame in their investigations. A Facebook spokesperson did no longer provide remark for this text and declined to confirm which authorities entities are nevertheless probing its business. The agency has previously stated it’s miles cooperating with authorities corporations at domestic and overseas.

Here are some of the authorities palms that are thought to be scrutinizing Facebook as of late March:

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC’s research of Facebook, which the employer confirmed closing March, reportedly centers on whether Facebook violated a 2011 agreement with the business enterprise that required Facebook to acquire specific permission from users before it shared their private information.

Facebook may want to face a “record-setting excellent” from the FTC, The Washington Post stated in January. The satisfactory could be predicted to pinnacle the $22.5 million penalties the organization imposed on Google in 2012 for allegedly violating its settlement to improve privacy practices, in keeping with the Post. Facebook has discussed a multi-billion-greenback settlement with the FTC, The New York Times pronounced in February.

An FTC spokesperson declined to verify the fame of the investigation or provide comment.

SEC, FBI and Northern District of California

The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Bureau of Investigation both began probing Facebook closing yr following the Cambridge Analytica reviews, Facebook confirmed in July after the Post stated their involvement. The organizations are reportedly looking into what executives knew approximately Cambridge Analytica’s get admission to user facts, when they knew it and whether they pronounced it to shareholders in a timely style.

Prosecutors from the Northern District of California have been also operating with the SEC and FBI to research the Cambridge Analytica scandal, in line with the Times, which it reported earlier this month is still energetic.

Spokespeople from the SEC, the FBI and the Northern District of California’s U.S. Attorney’s workplace declined to remark or verify the research.

Justice Department and Eastern District of New York

Prosecutors from the U.S. Legal professional’s workplace for the Eastern District of New York have been accomplishing crook research of Facebook, The New York Times mentioned earlier this month. A grand jury in New York subpoenaed data from at the least well-known businesses that make smartphones and different gadgets, in line with the Times. The groups reportedly had both partnered with Facebook to access personal information from hundreds of thousands and thousands of Facebook customers.

The Times pronounced in June that Facebook gave extensive get right of entry to its users’ statistics to at the least 60 corporations with which it had records-sharing agreements.

A spokesperson for the Eastern District of New York’s U.S. Attorney’s workplace could not verify or deny any research. The U.S. Justice Department did not straight away respond to CNBC’s request for remark.

Department of Housing and Urban Development

HUD filed a civil criticism towards Facebook on Thursday, charging the enterprise with “discrimination” in its advertising practices for housing. The organization is looking for damages for everybody harmed by means of Facebook’s targeted advertising rules. The enterprise has due to the fact changed its marketing machine to now not allow employers and landlords to restrict their centered target market by way of race, ethnicity or gender. It settled a lawsuit with the ACLU closing week over the exercise.

A senior HUD reputable told CNBC it expects that thousands and thousands of users can also be suffering from the allegedly discriminatory guidelines primarily based on the dimensions of Facebook’s platform.

A Facebook spokesperson told CNBC Thursday that it turned into amazed by HUD’s selection to record the grievance however said it will “continue running with civil rights experts on those troubles.”

Irish Data Protection Commission

The European Union’s facts safety watchdog group has launched more than one investigations into Facebook’s privateness practices. Ireland’s Data Protection Commission launched its annual document in February disclosing 15 ongoing investigations of principal tech firms as of the stop of 2018. Of the one’s investigations, 10 had been targeted at the statistics usage through Facebook and two products it owns, Instagram and WhatsApp.

The investigations largely centered around whether Facebook or its subsidiaries violated the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, which came into force closing May and is normally stricter than U.S. Statistics privateness regulation.

In a declaration, the Irish DPC showed it “currently has 10 statutory investigations open in relation to Facebook and its subsidiaries (Whatsapp and Instagram), a number of which are at a complicated stage in terms of a draft inquiry record being finalized for submission to the parties for their submissions at the inquiry findings. These investigations had been started out both in reaction to complaints the Irish DPC is ready to deal with because the lead supervisory authority of the agencies worried, and on the DPC’s very own volition having identified matters which warranted similarly investigation.”

Belgian Data Protection Authority

Facebook became scheduled to seem in front of an appeals court docket in Brussels for a two-day hearing this week to undertake a 2018 court docket order, which stated it has to forestall monitoring users and non-users without consent, in step with the BBC.

In a press release published Tuesday previous to the hearing, the DPA said that it stands by the court docket’s initial ruling and believes “that Facebook has to be ordered to appreciate Belgian and European privateness policies whilst it processes private records through its cookies, social plug-ins, and pixels.” If Facebook fails to comply with the court docket order, it can face a day by day quality of 250,000 euros, which would be the equivalent of extra than $280,000, according to Bloomberg.

German Federal Cartel Office

Facebook has appealed a February ruling from Germany’s Federal Cartel Office that called into question Facebook’s enterprise model and said it “overstepped” the boundaries of GDPR, especially in mild of what is known as “Facebook’s dominant function” within the marketplace.

“There is not any powerful consent to the customers’ records being accumulated if their consent is a prerequisite for the usage of the Facebook.Com service in the first region,” the case summary said.

The FCO gave Facebook 12 months to trade its records and cookie regulations to conform with the ruling. A spokesperson from the FCO did not right away respond to CNBC’s request for comment.